by Laurence Chen

My friend Karen joined an online community of product managers and took on the task of managing a mentor-mentee matchmaking system. She has years of experience as a product manager but lacks a background in software development. Driven by her strong passion for the community, she managed to develop a Python version of the mentor-mentee matching system using ChatGPT. Of course, the story isn’t that simple. The turning point came when she was stuck, no matter how she phrased her questions to ChatGPT, and she came to me for help.

Her stumbling block was this: she was asking ChatGPT top-down questions, so ChatGPT, using probabilities and statistics, generated high-level sequential logic code, essentially the policy part. This generated code would then need to call underlying library functions, the mechanism part, to perform bipartite matching calculations. This is where ChatGPT got stuck. For such tasks, even humans sometimes have to write some glue code to handle the impedance mismatch between policy code and mechanism code, so it was expected that ChatGPT would hit a wall.

By Alys Brooks

In case you haven’t been hanging out in our Discord or Slack channel or following Clojurists Together news, we’ve been accepted into the latest round of Clojurists Together! Many thanks to Clojurists Together and the backers who provide their budget. We’re also using OpenCollective funds to match our Clojurists Together grant—many thanks to our sponsors on OpenCollective!

You may have heard some updates from fellow awardees already—we opted for a delayed start and have been gearing up to make the most of our funds over the next six months.

By Alys Brooks

The usual pitch for Clojure typically has a couple ingredients, and a key one is the REPL. Unfortunately, it’s not always clear on what ‘REPL’ means. Sometimes the would-be Clojure advocate breaks down what the letters mean—R for read, E for eval, P for print, and L for loop—and how the different stages connect to the other Lispy traits of Clojure, at least. However, even a thorough understanding of the mechanics of the REPL fails to capture what we’re usually getting at: The promise of interactive development.

To explore why this is great, let’s build it up from (mostly) older and more familiar languages. If you’re new to Clojure, this eases you in. If Clojure’s one of your first languages, hopefully it gives you some appreciation of where it came from.

Six years after launching Lambda Island we’ve decided to flip the switch and make all content free. That’s right, all premium video content is now free for anyone to enjoy. Go learn about Reagent and re-frame, Ring and Compojure, or Clojure Fundamentals.

If you currently have an active subscription then it will be automatically cancelled in the coming days. You will no longer be charged. No further action is necessary.

Lambda Island is how the Gaiwan Team gives back to the Clojure community. We have released over thirty different open source projects, we write articles on our blog, post videos on our YouTube channel, we moderate the Lambda Island discord community, and provide a home for the ClojureVerse forum.

by Ariel Alexi and Arne Brasseur

Have you ever looked at your REPL and asked yourself “What am I supposed to understand from this?”. This is not just a junior thought, but one also common to more advanced programmers. What makes it hard is that Clojure error messages are not very informative. This is why a lot of work was put into improving these error messages.

The errors seem a bit strange at first, but you can get used to them and develop a sense of where to look. Then, handling errors will be much less difficult.

by Arne Brasseur

Years ago when I was still a programming baby, I read about a concept, a way of thinking about code, and it has greatly influenced how I think about code to this day. I’ve found it tremendously helpful when thinking about API design, or how to compose and layer systems.

Unfortunately I’ve found it hard at times to explain succinctly what I mean. I’ve also realized that I’ve built up my own mental framework around this concept that goes I think beyond the original formulation. So, in the hope of inspiring someone else, to maybe elicit some interesting discussion, and also just so that I have a convenient place on the web to link to, here’s my take on “policy” vs “mechanism”.

by Laurence Chen

There is a famous quote: Programming is thinking, not typing. After doing this job long enough, sometimes, I feel I am doing too much typing. No matter whether humans are thinking or typing, they use their brains, so I believe the word “typing” is a metaphor: typing refers to the kind of activities that we are doing unconsciously, doing through our muscle memory, not through our deliberate attention. Many of us, with enough experience, use quite a lot of muscle memory. On the other hand, do we use enough thinking when we need to?

We, humans, make a lot of decisions in our daily life: a decision like buying a car, or a decision like naming a function. Evolution makes us become the kind of animal that we can delegate certain parts of decisions down to our subconscious minds, which we may refer to as the background process in our brain. Therefore, we can focus our mind on something that matters. Here is the problem: what if the subconscious mind is not doing a good job? Most of the time, it is not a big deal, and escalating the issue back to foreground thinking can solve it. For example, when you press <localleader> e e to evaluate a form, but mistakenly evaluating the wrong form. You detect that, then you use your foreground thinking to decide what to do next. However, sometimes, when you know that the subconscious mind can not handle the job well before you begin the job, what can you do to prevent your subconscious mind from taking over control? Do we have any mechanism similar to the linux command fg, which can bring a process from background to foreground?

By Alys Brooks

It’s easy to forget the Java Development Kit is, in fact, a kit. Many Clojure developers, myself included, rarely work with commands like java directly, instead using lein, boot, or clojure. Often we don’t even use the Java standard library directly in favor of idiomatic wrappers.

There are a lot of advantages to staying in the Clojure level. Often, Clojure-specific tools ergonomically support common practices like live-reloading, understand Clojure data structures, and can tuck away some of the intermediate layers of Clojure itself that aren’t a part of your application.

By Alys Brooks

Community contributors and Lambda Island team members have been busy working on new projects and improving existing ones.

If you want to join in, check out our blog post calling for contributions, or jump right in to our first issues list.

By Arne Brasseur

In part 1 I set the stage with a summary of what nREPL is and how it works, how editor-specific tooling like CIDER for Emacs extends nREPL through middleware, and how that can cause issues and pose challenges for users. Today we’ll finally get to the “dynamic” part, and how it can help solve some of these issues.

To sum up again what we are dealing with: depending on the particulars of the nREPL client (i.e. the specific editor you are using, or the presence of specific tooling like refactor-clj), or of the project (shadow-cljs vs vanilla cljs), certain nREPL middleware needs to present for things to function as they should. When starting the nREPL server you typically supply it with a list of middlewares to use. This is what plug-and-play “jack-in” commands do behind the scenes. For nREPL to be able to load and use those middlewares they need to be present on the classpath, in other words, they need to be declared as dependencies. This is the second part that jack-in takes care of.

This first part is a recap about nREPL, nREPL middleware, and some of the issues and challenges they pose. We’ll break up the problem and look at solutions in part 2.

The REPL is a Clojurists quintessential tool, it’s what we use to do Interactive Development, the hallmark of the LISP style of development.

In Interactive Development (more commonly but somewhat imprecisely referred to as REPL-driven development), the programmer’s editor has a direct connection with the running application process. This allows evaluating pieces of code in the context of a running program, directly from where the code is written (and so not in some separate “REPL place”), inspecting and manipulating the innards of the process. This is helped along by the dynamic nature of Clojure in which any var can be redefined at any point, allowing for quick incremental and iterative experimentation and development.

by Laurence Chen

Have you ever had one of the following experiences before?

by Arne Brasseur

A key concept when working with Clojure is “the classpath”, a concept which we inherit from Clojure’s host language Java. It’s a sequence of paths that Clojure (or Java) checks when looking for a Clojure source file (.clj), a Java Class file (.class), or other resources. So it’s a lookup path, conceptually similar to the PATH in your shell, or the “library path” in other dynamic languages.

The classpath gets set when starting the JVM by using the -cp (or -classpath) command line flag.

By Alys Brooks

Recently, I was helping a coworker debug an issue with loading a Clojure dependency from a Git repository. (If you don’t know you can do this; it’s very handy. Here’s a guide.) I realized that there were really two Clojures at play: the Clojure that clojure was running to generate the classpath and the Clojure that was used by the actual Clojure program.

Taking a step back, there are really three things we might mean when we say “Clojure”:

It’s finally live! A gorgeous, in-depth redesign of the Lambda Island website. After months of hard work we soft-launched earlier this week. Today we want to tell you a little more about the project, the whys and the hows, and to invite you to check it out. And when you’re done do come tell us what you think on our Discord.

We already told you in a previous post how Lambda Island and Gaiwan are changing. In a short amount of time we went from a one man endeavor to a team of six, drastically changing what we are able to take on and pull off.

By Alys Brooks

It’s been a while since our last update! Community contributors and Lambda Island team members have been busy working on new projects and improving existing ones. We’re trying to strike a balance between venturing into new territory while ensuring existing projects continue to improve.

If you want to join in, check out our blog post calling for contributions, or jump right in to our first issues list.

Last month marked the five year anniversary of Lambda Island. Five years since I quit my job, built a video platform, and figured out how to put together tutorial videos. It’s been quite a ride. All this time I’ve been fortunate to be part of the Clojure community, to watch it grow and evolve, and to help individuals and companies to navigate these waters.

I learned some hard lessons along the way. Like how hard it is to bootstrap an educational content business catering to a niche audience, or how lonely and stressful it can be in business to go it alone.

And with these lessons came changes. I started doing more consulting work again. To some extent it was a necessity, but it also provided me with an opportunity to get involved with many Clojure projects out there in the wild. To work with talented individuals, to learn what amazing things people were doing, and to help shape these companies, products, and the greater narrative around Clojure as a technology and community.

By Ariel Alexi

Have you ever wondered what to do if you love cheese but you want to be a vegan and how this affects you when you learn Clojure?

This was my question too. I love cheese, but I wanted to find a good vegan cheese replacement for my breakfast sandwich. This wasn’t a fun journey, all the vegan cheese substitutes weren’t like the real deal! After a talk with one of my vegan friends, he told me that my point of view over cheese replacement in the sandwich was wrong. Instead of searching for a good and tasty vegan cheese replacement, just replace it with an avocado. Avocado is a good replacement for your morning sandwich without the compromising that you would do with tasteless vegan cheese substitutes.

By Ariel Alexi

An OOP developer finding her way in the functional world, what could go wrong?

So why Clojure?

By Alys Brooks

We’re always excited when someone new contributes a fix, test, documentation update, or even a major new feature to our open source projects. If you’re new to programming, open source projects are a great way to get experience working on a larger project. If you’re not so new, they can be an opportunity to try a new technology or work on a kind of software you usually don’t get a chance to. Either way, it’s rewarding to help out your fellow users or developers—these issues are for Kaocha, one of the most popular and advanced Clojure test runners.

But open source can also be intimidating. If you haven’t been sure where to start, then this post is for you! We’ve outlined the process step by step, and we’re here to support you every step of the way.

In an earlier post I tried to map out the Clojure/Java logging landscape a bit, so people can make an informed choice about how to set up logging for their application. There are several solutions out there with different trade-offs, and recently both Timbre and mulog have had some new releases. However until further notice the default logging setup in the “Lambda Island Stack” remains pedestal.log on the backend, and Glögi at the front.

This blog post is a bit of practical advice on how to make good use of logging, with the focus on these two libraries, which both provide the same API, just for a different platform.

This API consists of a number of macros corresponding with the different log levels, which all take key-value pairs as arguments.

Yesterday Vlaaad wrote a pretty cool blog post titled Alternative to tools.cli in 10 lines of code. It’s a great read and a very cool hack. It uses read-string to parse command line arguments, resolves symbols, and invokes the first symbol/function, passing in the rest of the parsed arguments. In other words: it’s the most straightforward way to translate a command line invocation into a Clojure function call.

The benefits are illustrated well in the post. It removes all possible friction. Want to add a new subcommand? Just add a function. Adding CLI arguments and options equals adding arguments and options to said function.

It’s actually not too different from what people do in shell scripts sometimes.

You may also like Dates in Clojure: Making Sense of the Mess

Logging seems like a simple enough concept. It’s basically println with a couple of extra smarts. And yet it can be oh so confounding. Even when you literally do not care a sigle bit about logging you may still be sent down a rabbit hole because of warnings of things that are or aren’t on the classpath. What even is a classpath?

Felipe and I have been busy again, read all about what we’ve been up to in this month’s Lambda Island Open Source update.

We currently have two major projects we are working to get out: Regal and Kaocha-cljs2. They are both still a work in progress, but we’ve again made some good progress this month. Regal is not officially out yet but is at the stage where people can safely start incorporating it into their projects. Kaocha-cljs2 is a big undertaking, but we’re splitting this work into smaller self-contained pieces, and two of those saw their first release this month: Chui and Funnel.

Regal

With people across the globe isolating themselves it feels sometimes like time is standing still, but looking back it’s been a busy month again for the folks here at Lambda Island. Besides all the maintenance releases we shipped some new features for lambdaisland.uri, our JS logging library Glögi, and a new micro-library, edn-lines. We also have some exciting work in progress, including a brand new browser-based test runner for ClojureScript, written with shadow-cljs in mind.

Funding

A big shout goes out to two of our clients, Nextjournal and Pitch. They have made a lot of this work possible either by funding projects directly, or by dogfooding our tools and libraries and giving us an opportunity to improve them. Thank you both for investing in this great ecosystem.

Back in December I wrote about a coding pattern that I’ve been using more and more often in my work, which I dubbed “Coffee Grinders”. My thoughts around this were still gelling at the time, and so the result was a meandering semi-philosophical post that didn’t really get to the point, and that didn’t seem to resonate that much with people.

Some of the responses I got were “just use functions” or “sounds like a finite-state machine”, which makes it clear that I was not in fact making myself clear.

Having continued to encounter and apply this pattern I’d like to present a more concise, semi-formal definition of coffee grinders.

tl;dr

We are launching an Open Collective for Lambda Island Open Source, to help support our Open Source and Community work. Please check it out, pass it (and this article) on to your boss, or consider contributing yourself.

It started with a mission

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Day 24, I made it! I did skip a day because I was sick and decided it was more important to rest up, but I’m pretty happy with how far I got.

Let’s see how the others fared who took on the challenge. John Stevenson at Practicalli got four posts out spread out across the advent period, similar to lighting an extra candle every sunday of the advent. Good job!

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

I’ve been a big fan of SVG since the early 2000’s. To me it’s one of the great victories of web standards. Mind you, browser support has taken a long time to catch up. Back then you had to embed your SVG file with an <object> tag, and support for the many cool features and modules was limited and inconsistent.

These days of course you can drop an <svg> tag straight into your HTML. What a joy! And since the SVG can now go straight into the DOM, you can draw your SVG with React/Reagent. Now there’s a killer combo.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

An extremely useful Emacs feature which I learned about much too late is the .dir-locals.el. It allows you to define variables which will then be set whenever you open a file in the directory where .dir-locals.el is located (or any subdirectory thereof).

Here’s an example of a .dir-locals.el file of a project I was poking at today.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Here’s a great life hack, to peal ginger don’t use a knife, use a spoon. I’m not kidding. Just scrape off the peal with the tip of the spoon, it’s almost too easy.

Here’s a Clojure + Emacs life hack:

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Something I’m pretty good at is coming up with random hacks. The thing where you’re like “hey how about we plug this thing into that thing” and everyone says “why would you do that that’s a terrible idea” and I’m like (mario voice) “let’s a go”.

And sometimes the result is not entirely useless. Like this little oneliner I came up with yesterday, using Babashka to “convert” a project.clj into a deps.edn.

Today’s post is published on Nextjournal. Enjoy!

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Here’s a little REPL helper that you may like.

(defn trace! [v]
  (let [m    (meta v)
        n    (symbol (str (ns-name (:ns m))) (str (:name m)))
        orig (:trace/orig m @v)]
    (alter-var-root v (constantly (fn [& args]
                                    (prn (cons n args))
                                    (apply orig args))))
    (alter-meta! v assoc :trace/orig orig)))

(defn untrace! [v]
  (when-let [orig (:trace/orig (meta v))]
    (alter-var-root v (constantly orig))
    (alter-meta! v dissoc :trace/orig)))

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Over the last year or so I’ve found myself using some variations on a certain pattern when modelling processes in Clojure. It’s kind of like a event loop, but adapted to the functional, immutable nature of Clojure. For lack of a better name I’m calling these coffee grinders. (The analogy doesn’t even really work but the kid needs to have a name.)

Since I saw Avdi Grimm’s OOPS Keynote at Keep Ruby Weird last year I’ve been thinking a lot about the transaction vs process dichotomy. Avdi talks about the “Transactional Fallacy” from around 15:25. From his slides:

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Two shell commands anyone using JVM languages should be familiar with are jcmd and jstack. They are probably already available on your system, as they come bundled with the JDK. Try it out, run jcmd in a terminal.

This is what the result might look like

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Because they didn’t like classes.

Almost missed today’s post, so I’ll keep it short.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

When I started consulting for Nextjournal I helped them out a lot with tooling and testing. Their data model is fairly complex, which made it hard to do setup in tests. I created a factory based approach for them, which has served the team well ever since.

First some preliminaries. At Nextjournal we’re big fans of Datomic, and so naturally we have a Datomic connection as part of the Integrant system map.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

I’m a strong believer in pair programming. It can be intense and exhausting, and its a skill you need to learn and get good at, but it’s extremely valuable. It improves knowledge sharing, prevents mistakes, and helps people to stay on track to make sure they are building the right thing, which is arguably one of the hardest aspects of our job.

But Gaiwan is a remote-first company. We are spread out across Germany, Brazil, Italy, and work with clients as far away as Singapore and Hong Kong, so we need good ways to pair remotely. For this we need a tool that is

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

I’ve been a fan of Integrant pretty much ever since it came out. For me there is still nothing that can rival it.

The recently released clip by the folks from Juxt does deserve an honorable mention. It has an interesting alternative approach which some may prefer, but it does not resonate with me. I prefer my system configuration to be just data, rather than code wrapped in data.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Recently I led a workshop for a client to help them improve their development process, and we talked a lot about Shape Up, a book released by Basecamp earlier this year that talks about their process. You can read it for free on-line, and I can very much recommend doing so. It’s not a long read and there are a ton of good ideas in there.

One of these ideas has also become a feature in Basecamp, namely hill charts. These provide a great way to communicate what stage a piece of work is in. Are you still going uphill, figuring things out and discovering new work, or are you going downhill, where it’s mostly clear what things will look like, and you’re just executing what you discovered?

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Clojure has this great feature called Dynamic Vars, it lets you create variables which can be dynamically bound, rather than lexically. Lexical (from Ancient Greek λέξις (léxis) word) in this case means “according to how it is written”. let bindings for instance are lexical.

(defn hello [x]
  (str "hello " x))

(defn greetings []
  (str "greetings" foo)) ;; *error*

(let [foo 123]
  (hello foo)
  (greetings))

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

I’ve always been a big UNIX fan. I can hold my own in a shell script, and I really like the philosophy of simple tools working on a uniform IO abstraction. Uniform abstractions are a huge enabler in heterogenous systems. Just think of Uniform Resource Locators and Identifier (URLs/URIs), one of the cornerstones of the web as we know it.

Unfortunately since coming to Clojure I feel like I’ve lost of some of that power. I’m usually developing against a Clojure process running inside (or at least connected to) my trusty editor, and the terminal plays second fiddle. How do I pipe things into or out of that?

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

doto is a bit of an oddball in the Clojure repertoire, because Clojure is a functional language that emphasizes pure functions and immutabilty, and doto only makes sense when dealing with side effects.

To recap, doto takes a value and a number of function or method call forms. It executes each form, passing the value in as the first argument. At the end of the ride it returns the original value.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

As an avid tea drinker I’ve been poring (pouring?) over this catalog of teas.

(def teas [{:name "Dongding"
            :type :oolong}
           {:name "Longjing"
            :type :green}
           {:name "Baozhong"
            :type :oolong}
           {:name "Taiwan no. 18"
            :type :black}
           {:name "Dayuling"
            :type :oolong}
           {:name "Biluochun"
            :type :green}])

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

I already showed you netcat, and how it combines perfectly with socket REPLs. But what if all you have is an nREPL connection? Then you use rep

$ rep '(clojure.tools.namespace.repl/refresh)'
:reloading ()
:ok

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Here’s a little Clojure idiom that never fails to bring me joy.

(into {} (map (juxt key val)) m)

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Ah clojure.core, it’s like an all you can eat hot-pot. Just when you think you’ve scooped up all it has to offer, you discover another small but delicious delicacy floating in the spicy broth.

In exactly the same way I recently became aware of two functions that until now had only existed on the periphery of my awareness. I’ve since enjoyed using them on several occasions, and keep finding uses for them.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

Part of what I want to do in this series is simply point at some of the useful tools and libraries I discovered in the past year. I’ve adopted a few tools for doing network stuff on the command line which I’ll show you in another post. First though we’ll look at a classic: netcat!

I’ve been using netcat for years, it’s such a great tool. It simply sets up a TCP connection and connects it to STDIN/STDOUT. Pretty straightforward. I’ve been using it more and more though because of Clojure’s socket REPL.

This post is part of Advent of Parens 2019, my attempt to publish one blog post a day during the 24 days of the advent.

An interesting aspect of the Clojure community, for better or for worse, is that it forms a kind of linguistic bubble. We use certain words that aren’t particularly common in daily speech, like “accretion”, or use innocuous little words to refer to something very specific. Even a simple word like “simple” is no longer that simple.

We can thank Rich Hickey for this. He seems to care a great deal about language, and is very careful in picking the words he uses in his code, documentation, and in his talks.

Ah, the advent, the four weeks leading up to Christmas. That period of glühwein and office year-end parties.

The last couple of years I’ve taken part in the Advent of Code, a series of programming puzzles posted daily. They’re generally fun to do and wrapped in a nice narrative. They also as the days progress start taking up way too much of my time, so this year I won’t be partaking in Advent of Code, instead I’m trying something new.

From the first to the 24th of December I challenge myself to write a single small blog post every day. If my friend Sarah Mirk can do a daily zine for a whole year, surely I can muster a few daily paragraphs for four weeks.

We are definitely back from holidays, and to demonstrate that we’re not just doing one but two live stream events!

Felipe and Arne pairing

Thursday 5 September, 13:00 to 15:00 UTC

Last weekend Heart of Clojure took place in Leuven, Belgium. As one of the core organizers it was extremely gratifying to see this event come to life. We started with a vision of a particular type of event we wanted to create, and I feel like we delivered on all fronts.

For an impression of what it was like you can check out Malwine’s comic summary, or Manuel’s blog post.

It seems people had a good time, and a lot of people are already asking about the next edition. However we don’t intend to make this a yearly recurring conference. We might be back in two years, maybe with another Heart of Clojure, maybe with something else. We need to think about that.

When I was 16 I was visited by a man who said he had come from the future. He had traveled twenty years back to 1999 to sit down with me and have a chat.

We talked for an hour or so, and in the end he gave me a few pieces of advice. I have lived by these and they have served me well, and now I dispense this advice to you.

Become allergic to The Churn

This post explores goog.log, and builds an idiomatic ClojureScript wrapper, with support for cljs-devtools, cross-platform logging (by being API-compatible with Pedestal Log), and logging in production.

This deep dive into GCL’s logging functionality was inspired by work done with Nextjournal, whose support greatly helped in putting this library together.

Clojure’s standard library isn’t as “batteries included” as, say, Python. This is because Clojure and ClojureScript are hosted languages. They rely on a host platform to provide the lower level runtime functionality, which also allows them to tap into the host language’s standard library and ecosystem. That’s your batteries right there.

This is a talk I did for the “Den of Clojure” meetup in Denver, Colorado. Enjoy!

Captions (subtitles) are available, and you can find the transcript below, as well as slides over here.

For comments and discussion please refer to this post on r/Clojure.

Yesterday was the first day for me on a new job, thanks to Clojurists Together I will be able to dedicate the coming three months to improving Kaocha, a next generation test runner for Clojure.

A number of projects applied for grants this quarter, some much more established than Kaocha. Clojurists Together has been asking people through their surveys if it would be cool to also fund “speculative” projects, and it seems people agreed.

I am extremely grateful for this opportunity. I hope to demonstrate in the coming months that Kaocha holds a lot of potential, and to deliver some of that potential in the form of a tool people love to use.

It’s been just over two years since Lambda Island first launched, and just like last year I’d like to give you all an update about what’s been happening, where we are, and where things are going.

To recap: the first year was rough. I’d been self-employed for nearly a decade, but I’d always done stable contracting work, which provided a steady stream of income, and made it easy for me to unplug at the end of the day.

Lambda Island was, as the Dutch expression goes, “a different pair of sleeves”. I really underestimated what switching to a one-man product business in a niche market would mean, and within months I was struggling with symptoms of burnout, so most of year one was characterised by trying to keep things going and stay afloat financially, while looking after myself and trying to get back to a good place, physically and mentally.

This is a guest post by Joanne Cheng (twitter), a freelance software engineer and visualization consultant based in Denver, Colorado. She has taught workshops and spoken at conferences about visualizing data with D3. Turns out ClojureScript and D3 are a great fit, in this post she’ll show you how to create your own visualization using the power of D3 and the elegance of ClojureScript.

I use D3.js for drawing custom data visualizations. I love using the library, but I wanted to try one of the several compile to JavaScript options, and I decided to look into ClojureScript. It ended up working out well for me, so I’m going to show you how I created a D3.js visualization using ClojureScript!

What we’re visualizing

Update: seems Stuart Sierra’s blog post has dropped off the internet. I’ve updated the link to refer to the Wayback Machine’s version instead.

Setting the Stage

When doing client work I put a lot of emphasis on tooling and workflow. By coaching people on their workflow, and by making sure the tooling is there to support it, a team can become many times more effective and productive.

Making Mayonnaise

Imagine you have a grandfather who’s great at making mayonnaise. He’s been making mayonnaise since before the war, and the result is truly excellent. What’s more, he does this with a good old fashioned whisk. He’s kept his right arm in shape throughout decades just by beating those eggs and oil and vinegar.

Now he’s bought himself a handheld electric mixer after hearing his friend rave about hers, but after a few tries he gives up and goes back to his whisk. He says he just can’t get the same result. This seems slightly odd, so the next time you go over you ask him to show you how he uses the mixer.

When learning a programming language we rarely read the reference documentation front to back. Instead someone might follow some tutorials, and look at sample code, until they’re confident enough to start a little project for practice.

From that point on the learning process is largely “just in time”, looking up exactly the things you need to perform the task at hand. As this goes on you might start to recognize some patterns, some internal logic that allows you to “intuit” how one part of the language works, based on experience with another part.

Developing this “intuition” — understanding this internal logic — is key to using a language effectively, but occasionally our intuition will be off. Some things are simply not obvious, unless someone has explained them to us. In this post I will look at something that frequently trips people up, and attempt to explain the underlying reasoning.

Update 2018-11-27: while most of this article is still relevant, I no longer recommend using JodaTime as the main date/time representation for new projects. Even existing projects that aren’t too invested in JodaTime/clj-time should consider migrating to java.time and clojure.java-time across the board.

Update 2 2019-05-29: Also check out the talk Cross Platform DateTime Awesomeness by Henry Widd, given at Clojure/north 2019

You can always count on human culture to make programming messy. To find out if a person is a programmer just have them say “encodings” or “timezones” and watch their face.

tl;dr: both Java and JavaScript have trouble dealing with unicode characters from Supplementary Planes, like emoji 😱💣.

Today I started working on the next feature of lambdaisland/uri, URI normalization. I worked test-first, you’ll get to see how that went in the next Lambda Island episode.

One of the design goals for this library is to have 100% parity between Clojure and ClojureScript. Learn once, use anywhere. The code is all written in .cljc files, so it can be treated as either Clojure or ClojureScript. Only where necessary am I using a small amount of reader conditionals.

The past week or so a lot of discussion and introspection has been happening in the Clojure community. Eric Normand responded to my one year Lambda Island post with some reflections on the size and growth of the community.

And then Zack Maril lamented on Twitter: “I’m calling it, clojure’s dying more than it is growing”. This sparked a mega-thread, which was still raging four days later. A parallel discussion thread formed on Reddit. Someone asked if their were any Clojure failure stories. They were pointed at this talk from RubyConf 2016, which seemed to hit a lot of people right in the feels, and sparked a subthread with a life of its own.

Meanwhile Ray, one of the hosts of the defn podcast reacted to the original tweet: “I’m calling it: Clojure is alive and well with excellent defaults for productive and sustainable software development.” This sparked another big thread.

Did you ever fix a bug in an open source library, and then had to wait until the maintainer released an updated version?

It’s happened to me many times, the latest one being Toucan. I had run into a limitation, and found out that there was already an open ticket. It wasn’t a big change so I decided to dive in and address it. Just a little yak shave so I could get on with my life.

Now this pull request needs to be reviewed, and merged, and eventually be released to Clojars, but ain’t nobody got time for that stuff. No sir-ee.

One year ago to date I launched Lambda Island, a service that offers high quality video tutorials on web development with Clojure and ClojureScript. It’s been quite a ride. In this post I want to look back at the past year, provide some insight into how this experience has been for me, and give you a glimpse of what the future has in store.

This story really starts in December 2015. After three years of doing contract work for Ticketsolve I decided it was time for a change. I have been self-employed for many years, but I knew that sooner or later I wanted to try my hand at selling a product, rather than selling my time.

In January and February I took some time for soul-searching, and recharging. I went to speak at RubyConf Australia, and got to hang out with some old friends around Australia and New Zealand. Once back in Berlin I got busy creating Lambda Island.

In the two most recent  Lambda Island episodes I covered in-depth how to create command line utilities based on Lumo, how to combine them with third party libraries, and how to deploy them to npmjs.com.

However there’s a different way to create tools with ClojureScript and distribute them through NPM, without relying on Lumo. In this blog post I want to quickly demostrate how to do just that.

To recap, Lumo is a ClojureScript environment based on Node.js, using bootstrapped (self-hosted) ClojureScript. This means the ClojureScript compiler, which is written in Clojure and runs on the JVM, is used to compile itself to JavaScript. This way the JVM is no longer needed, all you need is a JavaScript runtime to compile and run ClojureScript code, which in this case is provided by Node.js. On top of that Lumo uses nexe, so Lumo can be distributed as a single compact and fast executable binary.

I just released lambdaisland/uri, a pure Clojure/ClojureScript URI library. It is available on Github and Clojars.

This is a small piece of the code base that powers lambdaisland.com. It’s inspired by Ruby’s Addressable::URI, the most solid URI implementation I’ve seen to date, although it only offers a small part of the functionality that library offers.

It’s written in pure Clojure/ClojureScript, with only minimal use of .cljc reader conditionals to smooth over differences in regular expression syntax, and differences in core protocols. It does not rely on any URI functionality offered by the host, such as java.net.URL, so it’s usable across all current and future Clojure implementations (Clojure, ClojureScript, ClojureCLR).

Up until recently, to use re-frame subscriptions in Reagent views, you had to use a form-2 component.

A form-2 component is a function that returns another function, which does the actual rendering of the component to hiccup. In contrast, a form-1 component renders the hiccup directly.

;; form-1
(defn todo-item [todo]
  [:div.view
   [todo-checkbox (:id todo) (:completed todo)]
   [:label {:unselectable "on"} title]
   [:button.destroy {:on-click #(dispatch [:todos/remove (:id todo)])}]])

;; form-2
(defn todo-item [todo]
  (fn [todo]
    [:div.view
     [todo-checkbox (:id todo) (:completed todo)]
     [:label {:unselectable "on"} title]
     [:button.destroy {:on-click #(dispatch [:todos/remove (:id todo)])}]]))

This one had been sitting on my drive for a while, I thought it would be nice to share it with y’all. It’s a recording from a talk I did at the Clojure Berlin Meetup last October, about the various performance tricks that React, Reagent, and re-frame employ to make sure your apps are as spiffy as can be.

The slides are on-line as well.

This weekend it’s Ludum Dare again, the world’s longest running game jam. The idea is that, alone or with a team, you build a game in a weekend based on a certain theme.

We got a little team together here in Berlin, and so I’ve been reviewing what options there are for someone wanting to build a game in Clojure or Clojurescript.

The good news is there are plenty of options, as you’ll see from the list below. You can do desktop games, browser based games with canvas or webgl, and you can even create Unity 3D games, all from your comfortable Clojure parentheses.

Game of Life in Google Sheets, written in ClojureScript. Github and demo

Background story

Elm and other statically typed languages have a great feature called Union Types (also called Sum Types or Algebraic Data Types).

Here’s an example taken from Elm. Suppose your system used to represent users as integers, maybe just an auto-incrementing primary key, but then switched to UUIDs represented as strings.

To correctly model this situation, you need a way to create a type that can be either an integer or a string, that’s what union types give you.